Controversy in Mumbai's historic Matharpacady village over proposed redevelopment

The Advanced Locality Management (ALM) members of Matharpacady village in Mazgaon, Mumbai, have expressed their strong disapproval of a proposed cluster redevelopment project that threatens their historic neighbourhood. This centuries-old village is renowned for its vintage houses, and residents are concerned that the proposed redevelopment might result in the irreversible loss of these architectural treasures. The residents were taken aback by a letter from Shreepati Build Infra Heritage Pvt Ltd, which they claimed lacked a reasonable justification for the redevelopment. They fear that even if they reject the offer, the company may proceed with redevelopment because it has the support of the majority of members.
One resident who lives outside the redevelopment plan is concerned that he may also receive such a letter. He highlighted the unique charm of the village, with homes dating back to the 1800s, and expressed fears that all of this cultural heritage could be erased.
The letter from Shreepati Build Infra Heritage Pvt Ltd mentions their intention to redevelop properties under the Cluster Redevelopment Scheme, based on Development Control Regulations (DCR) 33 (9). It mentions approvals from the High Power Committee (HPC) and the government. The director of the company, Kumar Gandhi, stated that over 30% of the tenants in the MHADA transit camp have resided there for more than 40 years. He claimed that some tenants opposing the redevelopment have ulterior motives, and that each tenant would be provided a 550-square-foot carpet area flat and a monthly rent of Rs 15,000. A corpus of Rs 2 lakh would be given to each tenant, exceeding the Rs 50,000 stipulated by the rules.
The residents' concerns are rooted in the cultural and historical significance of their neighbourhood, which boasts unique vintage architecture and a rich heritage dating back to the 1800s. Their fear is that the proposed cluster redevelopment project will lead to the irrevocable loss of these architectural treasures. Many residents are puzzled by the lack of clear rationale in the letter they received from the development company, which indicates a plan to redevelop properties under the Cluster Redevelopment Scheme.
While a significant portion of the residents' properties are included in the redevelopment plan, they are hesitant to accept the proposal due to their attachment to the historical value of the neighbourhood. They feel that the village holds a distinct charm, with homes adorned with inscriptions from the 1800s, and they fear that the redevelopment would obliterate this unique character. As a result, they are strongly resisting the proposal.
It's important to highlight the significance of preserving historical and culturally important neighbourhoods, like Matharpacady village. Such areas often serve as living museums, offering a glimpse into the past and providing a sense of continuity with the city's history. The residents' concerns about the potential loss of their architectural heritage are valid, and it's essential to find a balance between development and preservation.
The case also raises questions about community engagement in redevelopment projects. It's crucial for developers and authorities to involve local communities in the decision-making process to address their concerns and consider the historical importance of the area. This can lead to more sustainable and culturally sensitive redevelopment.

Next (Land allotment draw by YEIDA expected to bolster revenue with Rs 698 crore)

Controversy in Mumbai's historic Matharpacady village over proposed redevelopment

This Month

Overview

Explore

Join Us