Dedicated locality research platform
Dedicated locality research platform
Enter your email address and you will receive
a link to reset your password
Following a comprehensive structural audit conducted by the district administration, concerning the Brisk Lumbini project situated in Sector 109, the developer has initiated repair work to address the identified structural defects. However, a cloud of discontent looms over the Resident Welfare Association (RWA) due to perceived lack of transparency in the repair process, specifically in terms of communication and updates shared with residents and the structural audit agency.
In response to these concerns, the RWA has taken a proactive stance by addressing the matter directly with the Department of Town and Country Planning (DTCP). Their core demand revolves around fostering collaboration among the structural audit firm, the RWA, and the developer to ensure that all repair work is conducted in accordance with established standards and procedures. A member of the RWA emphasized the importance of transparency, stating, that all repair work of structural deficiencies should be done as per standard procedure.
However, it appears that the developer has chosen not to respond to inquiries regarding the RWA's request for greater involvement in the repair process, leaving a significant gap in communication and cooperation between the concerned parties.
In light of the RWA's letter and their persistent concerns, District Town Planner (Planning) Rajesh Kaushik has taken action by directing DTP (Enforcement) Manish Yadav to investigate the matter. This move demonstrates the seriousness with which the authorities are treating the issue and underscores the importance of resolving it in a fair and equitable manner.
Asha Yadav, the General Secretary of the RWA, has been vocal about the structural audit company's apparent reluctance to assume responsibility for the quality of the ongoing repair work. She expressed her frustration by stating that the audit firm has even declined to certify the work or provide feedback on the progress and methodology employed in the repair process. The RWA contends that it is imperative for their structural committee members to be actively involved in identifying defects and overseeing the necessary rectifications to ensure the project's safety and security are restored to optimal levels.
This divergence in interests between the RWA and the builder and contractor adds an additional layer of complexity to the situation. While the RWA is primarily concerned with ensuring the highest standards of safety and quality, the developer and contractor may be driven by the desire to minimize expenses associated with the ongoing repair work.
Furthermore, the RWA has brought to light several critical issues related to the project's structural integrity, including concerns about RCC settlement, problematic swimming pool construction, subpar quality in the construction of economically weaker sections (EWS) flats, and issues with the sewage treatment plant (STP) sewerage system. In response to these pressing concerns, the RWA has requested clear and unequivocal recommendations from the audit firm to address these complex structural problems.
In summary, the Brisk Lumbini project in Sector 109 is currently embroiled in a dispute involving the RWA, the developer, and the structural audit agency. The primary issue revolves around transparency, communication, and the quality of ongoing repair work. The involvement of local authorities and the DTCP signifies the seriousness of the matter, and it remains to be seen how these stakeholders will collaborate to ensure that the structural deficiencies are rectified in a manner that satisfies all parties involved.
Propscience is India’s dedicated property news portal. We cover the latest events, news, trends, deals, new launches and more.
All our services and tools are completely free of cost and available 24X7!
