Dedicated locality research platform
Enter your email address and you will receive
a link to reset your password
The Bombay High Court has expressed shock and concern over the alarming levels of fraud observed in a slum rehabilitation scheme at Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC). The court criticized the overall state of affairs regarding slum redevelopment and called for a concerted effort to combat trafficking and profiteering. During the proceedings, the developer involved in the BKC project informed the court that tenancy rights for the slum units had been exchanged for exorbitant amounts, reaching up to Rs 2.3 crore.
In light of these revelations, the High Court emphasized the need to revisit the existing policy and reconsider the law governing slum redevelopment. The court pointed out that the current law provides an inherent guarantee of receiving a capital asset for free, despite encroaching on public land. It proposed that instead of granting ownership rights that can be transferred or sold, slum dwellers should be given rights to use the allocated flats.
The court further highlighted the failure of the slum rehabilitation law, enacted in 1971, to make Mumbai slum-free even after five decades. Justices Gautam Patel and Neela Gokhale, presiding over the case, expressed their skepticism regarding the city's current status and suggested that the policy should be reconsidered at the highest level to address the persisting issue.
The High Court was hearing a series of petitions filed by slum dwellers and a new developer, Budhpur Buildcon Pvt Ltd, who had taken over a slum scheme in Kolekalyan within the Bandra Kurla Complex. Previously, the project was being developed by Housing Development and Infrastructure Ltd (HDIL), which is now undergoing insolvency proceedings. The slum dwellers were seeking transit rent arrears and raising concerns about illegal occupants, while the new builder, an Adani group company, argued that the 2019 petition filed by the slum dwellers had suppressed crucial data indicating that a significant number of them had already transferred their tenancy rights for substantial sums.
During the proceedings, the court suggested a long-term measure of "insulating" the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) from political influences. As a part of its immediate actions, the court appointed a court receiver to take notional possession of the slum rehabilitation project at Kolekalyan. The court also directed the SRA special officer to identify trespassers and transferees. The SRA clarified that the slum scheme has a mandatory 10-year lock-in period, after which allottees can sell or transfer their rights to third parties.
Justice Patel, while dictating the order, stressed the importance of reevaluating the existing policy. He proposed an alternative approach where eligible hutment dwellers would be provided with a place for use and residence without ownership rights. He suggested that a premium be paid to the SRA for each subsequent transfer of such rights.
The developer, Budhpur Buildcon, requested an amendment to a previous court order that exempted the SRA from reassessing the eligibility of slum dwellers whose eligibility had already been accepted. The request was made in response to a petition by 31 slum dwellers seeking transit rent arrears. Budhpur Buildcon presented documents received from the HDIL resolution professional, revealing that a significant number of slum dwellers had transferred their tenements to HDIL in 2006 and 2007, receiving substantial amounts in return.
The court described these numbers as alarming and indicative of an ongoing fraud against the law. Additional groups of slum dwellers from the BKC project also filed petitions, highlighting unpaid transit rents and the inclusion of illegal occupants. In response, the developer's counsel argued that many of the petitioners had already received lump-sum payments for their tenancy rights. Another set of petitioners claimed to have been transferred rights to new rehabilitation homes from the original eligible slum dwellers.
In conclusion, the Bombay High Court emphasized the urgent need for comprehensive reforms in the slum rehabilitation policy to address the rampant fraud and improve the living conditions of slum dwellers. The court's suggestions included revisiting the law, providing usage rights instead of ownership rights, and insulating the Slum Rehabilitation Authority from political interference. These measures aim to rectify the shortcomings of the current system and ensure effective and fair slum redevelopment in Mumbai.
Propscience is India’s dedicated property news portal. We cover the latest events, news, trends, deals, new launches and more.
All our services and tools are completely free of cost and available 24X7!
We use cookies to give you the best possible service while using our website, please click accept and carry on browsing if you're happy with this. For more information see our Privacy Policy.
Okay, Got it!This disclaimer ("Disclaimer") is applicable to the entire Site. Upon entering the Site it is recommended that you immediately read the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy listed therein. Your continued usage of this Site will indicate your unconditional acceptance of the said Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy. You hereby agree that Propscience reserves the right to modify at any time, the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy governing this Site without prior notification. Your usage of the Site implies that you will be bound by any such modification. You agree and acknowledge that it is your responsibility to periodically visit the Site and stay updated with the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy of the Website.
The information contained in this Site has been provided by Propscience for information purposes only. This information does not constitute legal, professional or commercial advice. Communication, content and material within the Site may include photographs and conceptual representations of projects under development. All computer-generated images shown on the Site are only indicative of actual designs and are sourced from third party sites.
The information on this Site may contain certain technical inaccuracies and typographical errors. Any errors or omissions brought to the attention of Propscience will be corrected as soon as possible. The content of this Site is being constantly modified to meet the terms, stipulations and recommendations of the Real Estate Regulation Act, 2016 ("RERA") and rules made thereunder and may vary from the content available as of date. All content may be updated from time to time and may at times be out of date. Propscience accepts no responsibility for keeping the information in this website up to date or any liability whatsoever for any failure to do so.
While every care has been taken to ensure that the content is useful, reliable and accurate, all content and information on the Site is provided on an "as is" and "as available" basis. Propscience does not accept any responsibility or liability with regard to the content, accuracy, legality and reliability of the information provided herein, or, for any loss or damage caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with reliance on the use of such information. No information given under this Site creates a warranty or expands the scope of any warranty that cannot be disclaimed under applicable law.
This Site provides links to other websites owned by third parties. Any reference or mention to third party websites, projects or services is for purely informational purposes only. This information does not constitute either an endorsement or a recommendation. Propscience accepts no responsibility for the content, reliability and information provided on these third-party websites. Propscience will not be held liable for any personal information of data collected by these third parties or for any virus or destructive properties that may be present on these third-party sites.
Your use of the Site is solely at your own risk. You agree and acknowledge that you are solely responsible for any action you take based upon this content and that Propscience is not liable for the same. All details regarding a project/property provided on this Site are updated on the basis of information available from the respective developers/owners/promoters. All such information will not be construed as an advertisement. To find out more about a project / development, please register/contact us to visit the site you are interested in. All decisions taken by you in this regard will be taken independently and Propscience will not be liable for any such loss in connection with the same. This Site is for guidance only. Your use of this Site - including any suggestions set out in the Site and or any use of the resources available on this Site, do not create any professional - client relationship between you and Propscience. Propscience cannot accept you as a client until certain formalities and requirements are met.
We use cookies to give you the best possible service while using our website, please accept it and continue browsing if you're happy with this. For more information see our Privacy Policy